AI-POWERED CALL AUTOMATION & VOICE FAQ CHATBOT FOR MARKETING
| Detail | Information | |
|---|---|---|
| Publication Year | 2026 | |
| Author(s) | C. Jerin Rachel | |
| Journal Name | PCAS International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research | |
| Volume, Issue | Vol 3, Spl Issue 1 | |
| Pages | 73-78 | |
| Article Type | Paper | |
| DOI | NA | |
| Link for paper | https://pcasinternationaljournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/PCAS_IJMR_2026_03_001.docx-1. |
Keywords
Ethical authenticity, Bad faith, Self-deception, Absurdity, Moral freedom, Radical freedom, and Situatedness.
Attachment
Abstract
Drawing on Blaise Pascal’s comment on deux infinis, this paper traces the evolution of philosophical thought from René Descartes’ certainty “Je pense donc je suis” to Gilles Deleuze’s critique of the “image of thought.” Within this conceptual framework, the study analyses the existential tension between meaning and meaninglessness through a comparative analysis of Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre. The paper investigates Camus’ philosophy of the absurd through his concepts of revolt and rebellion, and his assertion that “One must imagine Sisyphus happy” as a form of resistance to existential meaninglessness. In contrast, it examines Sartre’s concepts of ‘mauvaise foi’ (bad faith) and ‘le regard’, emphasising the moral complications of radical individual freedom with critiques by Alvin Plantinga and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. The paper re-evaluates the moral and situational dimensions of Sartrean freedom.