Reviewer Policy

Expertise Requirement: Reviewers should have expertise in the subject area of the article they are reviewing.
Confidentiality: Reviewers must keep all submitted materials confidential and not share or disclose any information before publication.
Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest (e.g., personal or professional relationships with the authors).
Timeliness: Reviewers should provide feedback within a reasonable time frame, typically in a week time.
Constructive Feedback: Reviews should be objective, fair, and constructive, focusing on improving the quality of the article.
No Plagiarism: Reviewers must report any suspected plagiarism or unethical practices in the submitted manuscript.
Impartiality: Reviews should be unbiased and not based on personal opinions or preferences.
Respect for Authors: Reviewers should treat authors with respect and not make derogatory or offensive comments.
Revisions: Reviewers may recommend revisions to improve clarity, quality, or compliance with journal guidelines.
Final Decision: The final decision regarding publication (accept, minor/major revisions, or rejection) typically rests with the editor-in-chief, but the reviewer’s recommendations carry significant weight.